Collective Protection Networks for Remote Rural Communities: A Case Study of the Role of Social Networks in Protecting Rural Communities in Latin America

Collective Protection Networks for Remote Rural Communities: A Case Study of the Role of Social Networks in Protecting Rural Communities in Latin America


Working Paper No. 11

Protection International, May 2021

The Human Rights Defender Hub Working Papers Series


This Working Paper Series aims to make research related to HRDs freely accessible and to promote further discussion and research. The papers in this series present recent research findings, highlight under-explored issues, and set out theoretical or methodological approaches relevant to research concerning defenders. Working papers are intended as works in progress. Publication in this series should not preclude publication elsewhere.

The views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not imply endorsement by the Centre for Applied Human Rights or the University of York. Comments on each paper are welcomed and should be directed to the author(s).

The Working Paper Series is edited by Piergiuseppe Parisi. It is supported in part by a grant from the Open Society Foundations.

 

Acknowledgments


This working paper was funded by the Open Society through the HRD Hub, Centre for Applied Human Rights, University of York. The authors would like to acknowledge the hard work of PI teams in the field in Latin America who have participated in a multi-year participatory action research with human rights defenders and communities in remote rural areas of two countries. Our special gratitude goes to the members of the three communities who agreed to participate in the project, and who allowed us to collect the data for this research.

 

Executive summary

The dominant paradigm for the protection of human rights defenders at risk is the protection of individuals. Emergency grants, relocation programmes, urgent alerts, and awards, for example, tend to focus on protecting individuals at risk. This paradigm does not take into account the complexity of the defence of human rights as a lively process within social systems, linked to our human nature as social and relational beings.
 
In this paper we present the research undertaken with several rural communities in opposition to extractive projects in, or near to, their land and territories, in two Latin American countries. We apply the tools of social network analysis to describe and interpret how the community members of several ad hoc “early warning action committees” (EWACs) communicate among themselves and with external actors during several “emergency events” (e.g. aggressions carried out by perpetrators – i.e. external actors who carry out actions affecting the community).
 
After describing the different layers of communication and interaction within, and from, the EWACs, we discuss the results from a network analysis point of view and draw conclusions from them. We go on to propose several other avenues of future research needed to fully understand the dynamics and effectiveness of these community networks.
 
In sum, we posit that a relational approach, which includes networks and systems thinking, can become a useful tool that allows the incorporation of a number of crucial elements in the analysis of “protection”, including the complex interactions between community human rights defenders and other socio-political actors.
 
 
Implications for practice

A number of implications for practice follow:
  • Social network analysis (SNA) can be applied to describe and understand the work and protection structures of relationships that human rights defenders establish among themselves and with other actors. This analysis might offer a number of entry points to reinforce the structure and power of the network, even though more research is needed to fully understand which could be the best ways to do this.
  • When the SNA is undertaken in close collaboration with the communities, the results of the research can be discussed with selected community members so that they can reflect on eventual steps that might be taken for reinforcing the community network and its resilience.
  • Community members must trust researchers before sharing key information for analysing their networks. The information obtained to describe and understand the community networks is highly sensitive and it might be used to undermine community structures if it falls in the wrong hands.

 

About the authors


Protection International field research team:

  • Xabiel Zabala (PI senior advisor).
  • Elena Caal and Ilaria Tosello (former protection officers in PI Guatemala).
  • Betty Pedraza (former protection officer in PI Colombia).
  • Alexandra Loaiza (PI senior advisor).

 

Protection International desk research team:

  • Mauricio Ángel Morales, Head of the Policy, Research and Training Unit (PRTU) of PI Global Team (mangel [at] protectioninternational.org

    ).
  • Luis E. Eguren, PI Senior Advisor (qeguren [at] protectioninternational.org).

 

External experts, desk research team:

  • Julie M. Birkholz, Networks Matter, Ghent, Belgium(with the collaboration of Alice M. Nah, Centre for Applied Human Rights, University of York, York, UK).
  • Review: Piergiuseppe Parisi (Centre for Applied Human Rights, University of York, York, UK).
  • Correspondence to Mauricio Angel Morales (mangel [at] protectioninternational.org).

 

Table of contents


 

This policy brief, available on the Human Rights Defenders Hub, was made in collaboration between Protection International and York University.

Read the policy brief in English.

For More information, visit www.hrdhub.org/working-papers.

Stay in touch

Sign up to our newsletter

Spread the word